AI & Machine Learning Engineering
LangChain vs LlamaIndex: Which LLM Framework Should You Choose?
LangChain vs LlamaIndex: Choosing the Right Framework for Your AI Project
LangChain and LlamaIndex are leading frameworks for building LLM-powered applications in Python. LangChain focuses on action-centric orchestration for multi-tool agents and complex workflows, while LlamaIndex specializes in data-centric RAG with advanced document indexing and retrieval capabilities.
Core Architecture
LangChain: Action-Centric Framework
LangChain provides modular building blocks for creating complex agent systems. Its core philosophy centers on chains and agents that orchestrate tools, memory, and LLMs through graph-based control flow.
LangChain Python v0.3.x Architecture: LangChain Python v0.3.x focuses on production-ready agent development with stable APIs:
- LCEL (LangChain Expression Language): Declarative pipe-based composition (
|operator) - LangGraph: Stateful graph orchestration with nodes, edges, and conditional routing
- Pydantic Integration: Type-safe components with Pydantic v2 validation
- Standardized Interfaces: Consistent abstractions across LLMs, tools, and retrievers
Modular Package Structure (v0.3.x): The modular package structure in LangChain Python v0.3.x:
langchain-core: Base interfaces and abstractionslangchain: Core chains and agentslangchain-openai,langchain-anthropic: Partner integrationslangchain-community: Community-maintained integrationslanggraph: Stateful graph orchestration (separate package)
Key Components:
- LangGraph: Stateful graph orchestration with nodes, edges, and conditional routing
- LCEL: Declarative pipe-based composition (
|operator) - Agents: ReAct and function-calling patterns for autonomous decision-making
- Tools: Extensive library of integrations (web search, databases, APIs)
LlamaIndex: Data-Centric Framework
LlamaIndex excels at ingesting, indexing, and querying structured and unstructured data. Its architecture prioritizes efficient data retrieval through sophisticated indexing strategies.
Key Components:
- Indices: VectorStoreIndex, KeywordTableIndex, SummaryIndex
- Query Engines: Retrieval-augmented generation with customizable retrieval
- Workflows: Event-driven, async orchestration for multi-step processes
- Data Connectors: 150+ loaders for PDFs, SQL, APIs, vector databases
- LlamaParse: Advanced parsing for complex PDFs, tables, and multi-column layouts
Use Case Comparison
Choose LlamaIndex For
- Complex RAG applications requiring advanced retrieval strategies
- Document parsing from heterogeneous sources (PDFs, Notion, Slack)
- Complex PDF/table extraction using LlamaParse for production-grade parsing
- High-volume data ingestion with efficient chunking and embedding
- Custom retrieval with hybrid search, reranking, and metadata filtering
- Production RAG pipelines with built-in evaluation metrics
Choose LangChain For
- Multi-tool agents that orchestrate external APIs and services
- Complex logic flows with branching, loops, and conditional execution
- Chat applications with sophisticated memory management
- Quick prototyping with prebuilt agent templates and chains
- Stateful workflows requiring persistent agent memory
Code Examples
LlamaIndex RAG Implementation
import os
from llama_index.core import VectorStoreIndex, SimpleDirectoryReader
from llama_index.core.settings import Settings
from llama_index.llms.openai import OpenAI
# Configure API key
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-api-key"
# Configure LLM
Settings.llm = OpenAI(model="gpt-4", temperature=0)
# Load documents
documents = SimpleDirectoryReader("data/").load_data()
# Create index
index = VectorStoreIndex.from_documents(documents)
# Create query engine
query_engine = index.as_query_engine(
similarity_top_k=5,
response_mode="tree_summarize"
)
# Query
response = query_engine.query("What are the key findings?")
print(response)
This example demonstrates LlamaIndex's data-first approach: load documents, index them with embeddings, then query with built-in retrieval-augmented generation.
LangChain RAG Implementation (LCEL)
import os
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI, OpenAIEmbeddings
from langchain_chroma import Chroma
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from langchain_core.runnables import RunnablePassthrough
from langchain_core.output_parsers import StrOutputParser
from langchain_community.document_loaders import TextLoader
from langchain.chains import create_retrieval_chain
from langchain.chains.combine_documents import create_stuff_documents_chain
# Configure API key
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "your-api-key"
# Initialize components
llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4", temperature=0)
embeddings = OpenAIEmbeddings()
# Load and index documents
loader = TextLoader("data/document.txt")
documents = loader.load()
vectorstore = Chroma.from_documents(documents, embeddings)
retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 5})
# Define prompt
prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_template("""
Answer the question based on the context:
{context}
Question: {input}
""")
# Create chain using LCEL
question_answer_chain = create_stuff_documents_chain(llm, prompt)
rag_chain = create_retrieval_chain(retriever, question_answer_chain)
# Query
result = rag_chain.invoke({"input": "What are the key findings?"})
print(result["answer"])
This example shows LangChain's modern LCEL approach: compose retrievers, prompts, and LLMs using the pipe operator for declarative chain construction.
Orchestration Models
LlamaIndex Workflows
LlamaIndex uses event-driven async workflows with typed events for flexible branching and parallel execution.
from llama_index.core.workflow import StartEvent, StopEvent, Workflow, step, Context, Event
from llama_index.core import VectorStoreIndex
from llama_index.core.response_synthesizers import get_response_synthesizer
class RetrievalEvent(Event):
nodes: list
query_str: str
class RAGWorkflow(Workflow):
def __init__(self, index: VectorStoreIndex):
super().__init__()
self.index = index
self.response_synthesizer = get_response_synthesizer()
@step
async def retrieve(self, ctx: Context, ev: StartEvent) -> RetrievalEvent:
query = ev.query
nodes = await self.index.aretrieve(query)
return RetrievalEvent(nodes=nodes, query_str=query)
@step
async def synthesize(self, ctx: Context, ev: RetrievalEvent) -> StopEvent:
response = await self.response_synthesizer.asynthesize(
query_str=ev.query_str,
nodes=ev.nodes
)
return StopEvent(result=response)
LangGraph Stateful Graphs
LangGraph uses stateful graphs with shared state and conditional edges for iterative agent behavior.
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, END
from typing import TypedDict, Annotated
from operator import add
class AgentState(TypedDict):
messages: Annotated[list, add]
tool_calls: list
def agent_node(state: AgentState):
# Agent logic here
return {"messages": ["Agent response"], "tool_calls": []}
def tool_node(state: AgentState):
# Tool execution logic here
return {"messages": ["Tool result"], "tool_calls": []}
def should_continue(state: AgentState):
return "tools" if state["tool_calls"] else END
workflow = StateGraph(AgentState)
workflow.add_node("agent", agent_node)
workflow.add_node("tools", tool_node)
workflow.add_conditional_edges("agent", should_continue)
workflow.add_edge("tools", "agent")
workflow.set_entry_point("agent")
Integration Ecosystem
Vector Database Support
Both frameworks integrate with major vector stores:
LlamaIndex:
- Native support for Chroma, Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, Qdrant
- Built-in vector store abstractions with unified API
- Advanced retrieval: hybrid search, auto-merging, recursive retrieval
LangChain:
- 50+ vector store integrations via langchain-community
- Consistent retriever interface across all stores
- Self-querying retriever for metadata filtering
LLM Provider Compatibility
LlamaIndex:
- OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, HuggingFace, local models via Ollama
- Pydantic programs for structured outputs with validation
- Streaming responses and async support
LangChain:
- Broadest LLM support (100+ providers)
- Unified chat/completion interfaces
- Native function calling and tool binding
Performance Considerations
Retrieval Efficiency
LlamaIndex optimizes for retrieval quality:
- Advanced chunking strategies (semantic, recursive, parent-child)
- Reranking and query transformation
- Fusion retrieval combining multiple strategies
- LlamaParse for complex document parsing
LangChain optimizes for orchestration flexibility:
- Parallel tool execution
- Streaming intermediate steps
- Efficient state management in graphs
Evaluation
LlamaIndex provides:
- Built-in RAG evaluation (faithfulness, relevancy, context precision)
- Ragas integration for automated metrics
- Tracing via Langfuse, Arize Phoenix, Weights & Biases
LangChain offers:
- LangSmith for end-to-end tracing and evaluation
- Custom evaluators with LangSmith
- Integration with MLflow and Weights & Biases
Decision Matrix
| Factor | LlamaIndex | LangChain |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Data ingestion and RAG | Agent orchestration and tools |
| Learning Curve | Moderate (RAG-focused) | Steeper (broader abstractions) |
| Best For | Document-heavy applications | Multi-tool autonomous agents |
| Retrieval Quality | Superior with advanced strategies | Standard, customizable |
| Agent Capabilities | Growing (Workflows, Agents) | Mature (LangGraph, Agents) |
| Code Complexity | Lower for RAG use cases | Higher for complex workflows |
Learning Curve Justification: LangChain's steeper curve stems from its highly granular abstractions (chains, agents, tools, memory, retrievers) requiring understanding of multiple composition patterns. LlamaIndex provides higher-level defaults optimized for RAG, reducing initial complexity for document-focused applications.
Getting Started
For LlamaIndex
- Install:
pip install llama-index llama-parse - Choose your data loader from 150+ connectors
- Use LlamaParse for complex PDFs and tables
- Create an index:
VectorStoreIndex.from_documents() - Configure retrieval strategy (similarity, hybrid, auto-merging)
- Build query engine with response mode customization
For LangChain
- Install:
pip install langchain langchain-openai langchain-core langchain-community langgraph - Select components: LLM, embeddings, vector store, retriever
- Compose chains using LCEL (
|operator) or build LangGraph workflows - Add memory for conversational applications
- Deploy with LangSmith for observability
Note: LangChain Python v0.3.x maintains backward compatibility while providing improved type safety and performance.
Hybrid Approach
Many production systems use both frameworks:
- Use LlamaIndex for data ingestion, LlamaParse, indexing, and retrieval
- Use LangChain for agent orchestration, tool calling, and complex workflows
- Connect via shared vector stores or custom retriever adapters
This combination leverages each framework's strengths: LlamaIndex's data expertise and LangChain's orchestration capabilities.
Share this Guide:
More Guides
API Gateway Showdown: Kong vs Ambassador vs AWS API Gateway for Microservices
Compare Kong, Ambassador, and AWS API Gateway across architecture, performance, security, and cost to choose the right gateway for your microservices.
12 min readGitHub Actions vs GitLab CI vs Jenkins: The Ultimate CI/CD Platform Comparison for 2026
Compare GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins across architecture, scalability, cost, and security to choose the best CI/CD platform for your team in 2026.
7 min readKafka vs RabbitMQ vs EventBridge: Complete Messaging Backbone Comparison
Compare Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and AWS EventBridge across throughput, latency, delivery guarantees, and operational complexity to choose the right event-driven architecture for your use case.
4 min readChaos Engineering: A Practical Guide to Failure Injection and System Resilience
Learn how to implement chaos engineering using the scientific method: define steady state, form hypotheses, inject failures, and verify system resilience. This practical guide covers application and infrastructure-level failure injection patterns with code examples.
4 min readScaling PostgreSQL for High-Traffic: Read Replicas, Sharding, and Connection Pooling Strategies
Master PostgreSQL horizontal scaling with read replicas, sharding with Citus, and connection pooling. Learn practical implementation strategies to handle high-traffic workloads beyond single-server limits.
4 min readContinue Reading
API Gateway Showdown: Kong vs Ambassador vs AWS API Gateway for Microservices
Compare Kong, Ambassador, and AWS API Gateway across architecture, performance, security, and cost to choose the right gateway for your microservices.
12 min readGitHub Actions vs GitLab CI vs Jenkins: The Ultimate CI/CD Platform Comparison for 2026
Compare GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins across architecture, scalability, cost, and security to choose the best CI/CD platform for your team in 2026.
7 min readKafka vs RabbitMQ vs EventBridge: Complete Messaging Backbone Comparison
Compare Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and AWS EventBridge across throughput, latency, delivery guarantees, and operational complexity to choose the right event-driven architecture for your use case.
4 min read